Near miss by falling burrito; Technical analysis update

I went to CMG this past week to get more credit, and just after I put on this trade:

A Chipotle outside Columbus Ohio on Monday 7/30/2018

I had sold the 450 put and bought a 430 put to limit the risk on that side to $20 (minus the credit I received: 98 cents) ... By the time I looked at it Monday morning, the stock was down to $429 (i.e. total loss) ....

But (a) no smoking gun was found and the store was reopened the next day, and CMG stock recovered all the way back, almost:

I think I'm going to stop trading CMG and TSLA and stick with AMZN only for an equity in this 4-5 day timeframe. Both CMG and TSLA have been periodically (and not just during earnings!) prone to these violent moves, CMG from perceived pathogens and TSLA depending on Elon Musk's latest tweet ... and the perceived safety or lack thereof in its cars.

AMZN controls the world ... or at least is so much more a diverse and huge company than either of these other two,  so it should be less vulnerable to this sort of move (IMHO) ... GOOGL is a possibility for this reason also.

And if I want to stick strictly with indexes, I can always use RUT and/or NDX ... both are slightly more volatile (i.e. they pay better!) than SPX. The SPX advantage is its 3 expirations per week ...

Technical Analysis Update

I read a couple of books after my TAC (Technical Analyst Colleague) predicted a Wednesday close almost exactly on the money 10 days ago. But I've concluded that while technical analysis may be valuable for some (including TAC), I don't think it's for me.

I closely read this book:

This guy is a fundamental analyst who reads a lot of newspapers ... I don't do fundamental analysis but I do like newspapers! So this rang a bell with me.

His take on Technical Analysis: Fuhgetaboutit ... gives numerous of examples of public predictions of TA practitioners not working.

Overall: a good book and very enjoyable to read.

Another book I merely skimmed so admit I may have missed something:

The author goes through a lot of space giving the scientific method and statistics and whatnot, all of which I was familiar with coming in and so just flipped through at high speed. 

His conclusion (also read at high speed so may have missed something) was that the only real evidence he could cite was the head-and-shoulders pattern 

... does work for trading futures, but he couldn't cite anything else that was proven to work.

All that being said, I do see traders that swear by TA and are apparently making money using it. So how is this possible?

One possibility is that the best of them have such experience in the markets and looking at the charts that they intuitively see what's coming and where to draw the channel lines, etc. Tim Knight is an example of this kind. In his Tastytrade show Last Call he spends 15 minutes on charts and apparently does well trading this way. But seeing where to put every stop isn't (apparently) one can program ...

Best of luck to all technicians out there, including my colleague TAC, but I think I can win without being a technician myself.

Results chart after this week's trades:

Expiration	Underlying	Long put	Short put	Short call	Long call	Credit Received	Result
07/16/2018/	SPX	2680	2730	2810	2860	$3.60	Won 100%
07/18/2018/	SPX	2700	2750	2820	2870	$3.95	Won 100%
07/20/2018/	SPX	2700	2750	2835	2885	$2.40	Won 100%
07/20/2018 (a.m.)/	NDX	7260	7310	7410	7460	$5.99	Won 100%
07/25/2018	SPX	2705	2755	2835	2885	$2.40	lost 16% of amount at risk
07/27/2018	SPX	2695	2745	2825	2875	$3.50	Won 100%
07/30/2018	SPX	2720	2770	2850	2900	$2.60	Won 100%
08/01/2018	SPX	2730	2780	2870	2920	$2.15	Won 100%
08/03/2018	CMG	430	450	490	510	$1.01	Won 100%
08/03/2018	AMZN	1692.5	1722.5	1887.5	1917.5	$2.60	Won 100%

9 for 10 winners (90%) and the loser only lost 16% ... may present trends continue! More next week ...