Volatility in the S&P Futures market returned this week with a vengeance:
This means that the options on this futures product (/ES, the "e-mini" S&P futures) pay very much more than they did when the market was at record highs.
For example, selling a ".30 delta" (3190 put, 3275 call) expiring in 8 days returns $1875 ($1868 after commissions.) Assuming we have to do our "cover" even 3 times over the week, losing one tick ($12.50) plus commissions ($5.50) each time and we wait until we have all but the last 15% of the credit, that makes us:
$1868
- 3x $18
- 0.15 * $1868 =
$1520 the first week.
Then say volatility declines by 10% for the next week and stays flat the final 2 weeks. So we'd get
$1520 first week
$1368 2nd week
$1368 3rd week
$1368 4th week
Total $5624 ... starting on a $12500 account, which is the approximate value of the one we have going live next week, that's +44% for the month.
Unbelievable? No; I'll start proving it this coming week.
I'm collecting email addresses to send out real results ... send an email to info@intuitivecapitalmgmt.com and I'll add yours to my list.
More next week, and expect an email report too.
Showing posts with label speculative results. Show all posts
Showing posts with label speculative results. Show all posts
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Sunday, January 21, 2018
A look at real returns over the period I've been trading NDX
I started testing the NDX trade with 1-lots (the minimum) on Thursday, October 26, 2017. Since then, the main account I've been testing with is up from $5126 to $6903. This is nearly 35%!
... for just those 13 weeks. And I was just testing, trading 1-lots ... if I'd been using the 1/2 Kelly Criterion I'd have lost more the first week but gained double or more for the following 10 weeks ... I calculate the gain would then have been in the range of 50%!
Getting back to the realm of speculation, but standing on the real test results of the past 13 weeks and assuming 91.7% wins on a firm footing, I think: the one-year Monte Carlo mean result if I assume 15 percent gain on each winning trade and 100% loss on each losing one, risking 33% of the account always:
... for just those 13 weeks. And I was just testing, trading 1-lots ... if I'd been using the 1/2 Kelly Criterion I'd have lost more the first week but gained double or more for the following 10 weeks ... I calculate the gain would then have been in the range of 50%!
Getting back to the realm of speculation, but standing on the real test results of the past 13 weeks and assuming 91.7% wins on a firm footing, I think: the one-year Monte Carlo mean result if I assume 15 percent gain on each winning trade and 100% loss on each losing one, risking 33% of the account always:
Finally, if I assume the same as the above run but with an average 20 percent gain: 334%!
And: that's assuming 100% loss on every losing trade, which almost certainly won't be that extreme ...
Wahoo!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





