Back on track and considering the value of rolling

I lost my 3rd trade in a row on Monday's expiration (details below), but since then:

• 2 SPX expirations, both winners
• the Fabulous NDX a.m. settlement trade was also available this week, winning again

About that third loss in a row: the short SPX strike for Monday the 14th was at 2720 ... the futures market was up all night and the market came back during the day, but not enough. It closed at 2730.13, a 30% or so loser (since the wings were $30 wide; I was long the 2750 call).

But the next day the market was down into the right range, closing at 2711, and only up to 2722 on Wednesday the 16th. So if I had rolled the call wing out and up to short 2730 and long 2760 for Wednesday expiration (for an extra small credit), that would have worked. Alternatively, I could have rolled laterally (sticking with 2720/2750 strikes) out to Wednesday (larger credit) and rolled again to Friday when that showed problems for Wednesday. Friday close was back to 2712, so that also would have worked for full profit.

I hope not to have to put this into practice for the rest of the month ... there are only 5 more expirations in may and I'd just as soon have them all expire worthless without rolling.

But I'm comfortable taking more risk with the rolling strategy on the call side; if the "meteor strike" comes while this extra trade is on, all it does is reduce the overall loss. The "put wing" will already have expired worthless, so an extra one of these rolling for profitability is OK.

Another change I'm considering for next month: substituting certain relatively volatile underlyings (AMZN, TSLA, etc.) for the Monday->Friday trade. This should make a bit more money than doing the trade on SPX at its currently depressed volatility.

The rolling ability for this kind of back-and-forth market is metaphorically a protection for our new growth:

More next week!